4.1 Article

In-office bleaching with complete cervical third protection protocol: A split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 281-285

出版社

MOSHER & LINDER, INC

关键词

-

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Ministry of Education, Brazil [001]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [308286/2019-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on 35 participants found that extending the gingival barrier to the cervical region did not reduce the risk and intensity of bleaching sensitivity, nor impact the bleaching effectiveness.
Purpose: To evaluate the bleaching sensitivity and the bleaching effectiveness of in-office bleaching, following a protocol of complete cervical third protection with gingival dam in comparison with a traditional manner of applying gingival dam (used only in the gingival sulcus area). Methods: 35 participants were selected for this double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial. The control group received the gingival barrier in the traditional manner, and in the experimental group the barrier was extended by about 3 mm to include the cervical region. The bleaching agent was applied in two sessions. The risk and intensity of bleaching sensitivity were assessed using two scales. The bleaching effectiveness was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer with the tip placed in the cervical area. The absolute risk of bleaching sensitivity was compared by the McNemar's test and bleaching effectiveness (Delta Eab, Delta E00 and Delta Wi) and intensity of bleaching sensitivity was evaluated by Wilcoxon-paired test (alpha=0.05). Results: No significant difference at risk (P= 1.0) and intensity of bleaching sensitivity (P> 0.45) was seen between groups. After 30 days, bleaching effectiveness had no statistical difference between the groups (P> 0.09). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Extending the barrier in the cervical region of teeth did not reduce the risk and intensity of bleaching sensitivity, nor jeopardize the bleaching effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据