3.8 Article

Thin-walled hollow fibers for flexible high energy density fiber-shaped supercapacitors

期刊

ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OAE PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.20517/energymater.2021.14

关键词

Fiber-shaped supercapacitors; PEDOT:PSS; energy density; flexible

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875226, 52072352, U20A2072]
  2. Foundation for the Youth S&T Innovation Team of Sichuan Province [2020JDTD0035]
  3. Tianfu Rencai Plan
  4. Chengdu Talent plan
  5. Science and Technology Projects for Administration for Market Regulation of Sichuan Province [SCSJ2020016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces hollow poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate thin-walled fibers (HPFs) prepared by coaxial wet-spinning, which exhibit high electrochemical performance and flexibility, showing good specific areal capacitance, high energy density, and excellent cycling stability.
Fiber-shaped supercapacitors, which occupy minimal volume and possess remarkable flexibility, are particularly promising candidates for next-generation smart wearable devices. However, the state-of-the-art energy density and mechanical properties of fiber-shaped electrodes are far from satisfactory. Herein, hollow poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate thin-walled fibers (HPFs) are continuously prepared by coaxial wet-spinning. These HPFs combine a simple and high continuous preparation with high electrochemical performance and flexibility, owing to their hollow nature, small diameter (125 mu m) and thin wall structure (8 mu m). As a result, the HPFs display a specific areal capacitance of 115.2 mF cm(-2) at a current density of 0.3 mA cm(-2) with a high energy density of 9 mu Wh cm(-2) at a power density of 0.112 mW cm(-2). Furthermore, the HPFs maintain 81% of the initial capacitance after 10,000 cycles with similar to 100% Coulombic efficiency. More importantly, the specific capacitance is almost completely maintained after bending 3000 times at 180 degrees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据