3.9 Article

Landslide susceptibility zonation using geospatial technique and analytical hierarchy process in Sikkim Himalaya

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.qsa.2021.100039

关键词

Landslide; Geospatial technique; Analytical hierarchy process; Sikkim; Himalaya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized a combination of remote sensing, GIS, and AHP method to delineate landslide susceptibility maps in Sikkim Himalaya, India. The results indicated varying levels of landslide susceptibility in the study area, providing valuable information for identifying different susceptibility zones.
This study aims to delineate landslide susceptibility maps using an integrated approach of remote sensing, geographical information system (GIS), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, for Sikkim Himalaya, India. Multiple data as lithology, lineament density, geomorphology, slope, soil, rainfall, drainage density, and land use/land cover have been considered for delineating the landslide susceptibility maps. Spatially distributed maps/thematic layers of all the aforementioned parameters were created using remotely sensed as well as ground data in a GIS environment. These thematic layers were assigned suitable weights on the Saaty's scale according to their relative importance in landslide occurrence in the study area. The assigned weights of the thematic layers and their features were then normalized by using the AHP technique. Finally, all thematic layers were integrated by a weighted linear combination method in a GIS environment to generate landslide susceptibility maps. The delineated landslide susceptibility map in the study area was categorized as 'Very Low (0.18%)', 'Low (63.34%)', 'Moderate (0.06%)', 'High (33.60%)', and 'Very High (2.76%)', respectively. Area Under the Curve (AUC) curve shows the accuracy assessment of the study area based on AHP model and landslide inventory is 73%. The results of this study may be useful to identify the landslide susceptibility zones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据