4.8 Article

Electrochemically synthesized SnO2 with tunable oxygen vacancies for efficient electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 13, 期 38, 页码 16307-16315

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr04621g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2020YFB1506001]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program [2021YFG0231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By controlling the oxygen vacancy concentration, synthesized SnO2 exhibits excellent NRR performance as an electrocatalyst, improving the efficiency of nitrogen fixation.
Electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) driven by a renewable energy source offers a sustainable and environmentally benign route to produce ammonia (NH3), but it is highly dependent on efficient and specific catalysts to reduce the high reaction barrier and improve the selectivity. Defect engineering is extensively used to regulate the surface properties of materials to improve their catalytic performance. Herein we synthesized SnO2 with different oxygen vacancy concentrations by a controllable electrochemical method for electrocatalytic nitrogen (N-2) fixation. The prepared SnO2 was used as an electrocatalyst and exhibited excellent NRR performance with an optimal NH3 yield rate of 25.27 mu g h(-1) mg(cat.)(-1) and faradaic efficiency of 11.48% at -0.6 V (vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode) in 0.1 M Na2SO4. Oxygen vacancies provide more active sites and greater electron transfer ability on the catalyst surface to facilitate N-2 adsorption and activation. The electrocatalytic NRR performance of SnO2 was enhanced with the increase in oxygen vacancy concentration. The density functional theory calculations indicate that the oxygen vacancies in SnO2 promote the electrocatalytic NRR performance by increasing the number of valence electrons of Sn and decreasing the energy barrier of the potential-determining step, thus promoting the activation of the N-N bond to further achieve efficient N-2 fixation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据