4.6 Review

Cardioprotective Roles of Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Derived Exosomes

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.717536

关键词

cardiovascular diseases; EPC-derived exosomes; anti-inflammatory; anti-apoptosis; cardiac fibrosis; cell regeneration

资金

  1. Foundation of Key Discipline Construction of Zhejiang Province for Traditional Chinese Medicine [2017-XKA36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rising prevalence of cardiovascular diseases globally, the transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) holds promise in CVD therapy. Research suggests that EPC-derived exosomes (EPC-EXs) may have protective effects on the heart and blood vessels, playing roles in anti-inflammation, antioxidant, anti-apoptosis, and other processes.
With the globally increasing prevalence, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become the leading cause of mortality. The transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) holds a great promise due to their potential for vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and protective cytokine release, whose mechanisms are essential for CVD therapies. In reality, many investigations have attributed the therapeutic effects of EPC transplantation to the secretion of paracrine factors rather than the differentiation function. Of note, previous studies have suggested that EPCs could also release exosomes (diameter range of 30-150 nm), which carry various lipids and proteins and are abundant in microRNAs. The EPC-derived exosomes (EPC-EXs) were reported to act on the heart and blood vessels and were implicated in anti-inflammation, anti-oxidation, anti-apoptosis, the inhibition of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), and cardiac fibrosis, as well as anti-vascular remodeling and angiogenesis, which were considered as protective effects against CVDs. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on using EPC-EXs as therapeutic agents and provide a detailed description of their identified mechanisms of action to promote the prognosis of CVDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据