4.4 Article

Measurement of the 232Th(n,f) cross section with quasi-monoenergetic neutron beams in the energy range 2-18 MeV

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00590-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund - ESF)
  2. Greek national funds [MIS 5033021]
  3. Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation (NSRF) [MIS 5002799]
  4. European Union (European Regional Development Fund)
  5. IKY scholarships program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fission cross section of Th-232 at fast neutron energies was measured using Micromegas detectors. Quasi-monoenergetic neutron beams were generated via specific reactions, with U-238(n,f) and U-235(n,f) as references. Actinide samples were characterized using alpha-spectroscopy with a SSB detector, and Monte Carlo simulations were utilized for data analysis.
The fission cross section of Th-232 has been measured at fast neutron energies, using a setup based on Micromegas detectors. The experiment was performed at the 5.5 MV Van de Graaff Tandem accelerator in the neutron beam facility of the National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos. The quasi-monoenergetic neutron beams were produced via the H-3(p,n), H-2(d,n) and H-3(d,n) reactions, while the U-238(n,f) and U-235(n,f) reactions were used as references, in order to acquire cross-section data points in the energy range 2-18 MeV. The characterization of the actinide samples was performed via alpha-spectroscopy with a Silicon Surface Barrier (SSB) detector, while Monte Carlo simulations with the FLUKA code were used to achieve the deconvolution of the Th-232 alpha peak from the alpha background of its daughter nuclei present in the spectrum. Special attention was given to the study of the parasitic neutrons present in the experimental area, produced via charged particle reactions induced by the particle beam and from neutron scattering. Details on the data analysis and results are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据