4.6 Review

Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dogs: Review on Biomechanics, Etiopathogenetic Factors and Rehabilitation

期刊

VETERINARY SCIENCES
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8090186

关键词

cranial cruciate ligament; rupture; biomechanics; etiopathogenesis; rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) rupture is a common orthopaedic condition in veterinary medicine, impacting the stability and biomechanics of the femoral-tibio-patellar joint in dogs. Treatment options include conservative and surgical approaches, with decisions influenced by factors such as patient age, health, and cost. Physiotherapy is essential for restoring proper limb functionality and enabling a return to normal activities.
Cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) rupture is one of the most common orthopaedic conditions in veterinary medicine. CrCL plays a fundamental role in the stability and biomechanics of the femoral-tibio-patellar joint, and its incorrect functionality severely impacts on the quality of life of patients. In dogs, the structural weakening of this joint due to the progressive degeneration of the ligament is the most accredited etiopathogenetic hypothesis in relation to the dog signalment (breed, sex and age) and the stifle joint conformation. In humans, this injury is often traumatic and generally occurs during sporting activities. CrCL rupture can be managed conservatively or surgically, and decisions regarding treatment are due to numerous factors: the patient's age and health, the degree of stifle instability, and cost. Physiotherapy protocols play an important role in rehabilitation, with similar goals in humans and dogs: pain management, physiological articular range of motion recovery, periarticular and core muscle strengthening, and proprioceptive deficit correction. Physiotherapy, even if often neglected in veterinary medicine, is mandatory for the recovery of the correct functionality of the injured limb and for the return to normal daily and sporting activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据