4.6 Review

Carbon-based single atom catalysts for tailoring the ORR pathway: a concise review

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 44, 页码 24803-24829

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta06144e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22002013]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20RC(3)021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon-based single-atom catalysts (C-SACs) have shown significant advantages in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) through structure modulation and dual active site synergistic catalysis to enhance catalytic selectivity and activity. Future directions include overcoming challenges in C-SACs for the ORR and promoting their industrialization.
Carbon-based single-atom catalysts (C-SACs), featuring a flexible, well-defined atomic geometry and superior electrical conductivity, have experienced a rapid development in the last decade and provided unique opportunities in selective oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysis via a direct 4e(-) pathway or an alternative 2e(-) pathway for sustainable energy conversion and chemical synthesis. This concise review summarizes recent experimental efforts aimed at tailoring selectivity and activity, and deriving progressive guidelines for catalyst design. First, the current exploration and development of synthetic methodologies of diverse C-SACs for the ORR are briefly outlined. Then we present a key overview of structure-dependent catalytic selectivity and activity properties, in particular emphasizing the microenvironment modulation of single-atom active sites from the aspects of regulating the central metal atoms, coordination environment and support properties. Besides, the dual active site enabled synergistic catalysis for breaking the conventional scaling relation is also highlighted. Finally, the current remaining challenges in C-SACs for the ORR and related perspectives are proposed to shed some light on the further developments toward industrialization in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据