3.8 Review

Towards Optimal pH of the Skin and Topical Formulations: From the Current State of the Art to Tailored Products

期刊

COSMETICS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cosmetics8030069

关键词

skin pH; acidic topical products; cosmetics

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia [451-03-9/2021-14/200161]
  2. Sebapharma GmbH & Co. KG, Boppard/Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin surface acidity plays a crucial role in maintaining skin health and barrier function, affecting keratinocyte differentiation, epidermal lipid formation, skin microbiome, and diseases. Therefore, controlling skin pH value can promote skin health, and formulating acidic products can effectively maintain skin health.
Acidic pH of the skin surface has been recognized as a regulating factor for the maintenance of the stratum corneum homeostasis and barrier permeability. The most important functions of acidic pH seem to be related to the keratinocyte differentiation process, the formation and function of epidermal lipids and the corneocyte lipid envelope, the maintenance of the skin microbiome and, consequently, skin disturbances and diseases. As acknowledged extrinsic factors that affect skin pH, topically applied products could contribute to skin health maintenance via skin pH value control. The obtained knowledge on skins' pH could be used in the formulation of more effective topical products, which would add to the development of the so-called products 'for skin health maintenance'. There is a high level of agreement that topical products should be acidified and possess pH in the range of 4 to 6. However, formulators, dermatologists and consumers would benefit from some more precise guidance concerning favorable products pH values and the selection of cosmetic ingredients which could be responsible for acidification, together with a more extensive understanding of the mechanisms underlaying the process of skin acidification by topical products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据