3.8 Article

A Fair Distribution of Responsibility for Climate Adaptation-Translating Principles of Distribution from an International to a Local Context

期刊

PHILOSOPHIES
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/philosophies6030068

关键词

responsibility; forward-looking responsibility; fair distribution; climate change adaptation; local adaptation

资金

  1. FORMAS (Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning) [FR-2018/0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that distribution principles at the international level can be somewhat applicable to local climate adaptation, with the principles of ability, self-help, and limited responsibility for the worst off being particularly useful. However, challenges arise in the need for multiple agents to take on responsibility and emissions not serving as a suitable base for all principles. By utilizing the ability principle, the first problem can be addressed, while focusing on risk of harm instead of emissions could help overcome the second challenge.
Distribution of responsibility is one of the main focus areas in discussions about climate change ethics. Most of these discussions deal with the distribution of responsibility for climate change mitigation at the international level. The aim of this paper is to investigate if and how these principles can be used to inform the search for a fair distribution of responsibility for climate change adaptation on the local level. We found that the most influential distribution principles on the international level were in turn built on one or more of seven basic principles: (P1) equal shares, (P2) desert, (P3) beneficiary pays, (P4) ability, (P5) self-help, (P6) limited responsibility for the worst off, and (P7) status quo preservation. It was found that all the basic principles, but P1, P3, and P7, are to some extent translatable to local climate adaptation. Two major problems hamper their usefulness on the local level: (1) several categories of agents need to take on responsibility; and (2) emissions do not work as a base for all principles. P4, P5, and P6 are applicable to local adaptation without changes. P4 is of particular importance as it seems to solve the first problem. P2 is applicable only if the second problem is solved, which can be achieved by using risk of harm instead of emissions as the basis for desert.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据