4.6 Article

Use of a 3-D Wireless Power Transfer Technique as a Method for Capsule Localization

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 131685-131695

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114212

关键词

3-D receiver; capsule endoscopy; localization technique; liquid phantom; wireless power transfer

资金

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/K034537/2, EP/P027415/1]
  2. Heriot-Watt University through the International Doctoral Training Account (DTA)
  3. EPSRC [EP/P027415/1, EP/K034537/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capsule endoscopy is considered a technological breakthrough in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal pathologies. Accurately determining the capsule's location is crucial for surgical intervention or drug delivery, necessitating further research to improve localization techniques. The dual use of wireless power transfer as a method for determining capsule location shows promising results with a maximum error of 12%.
Capsule endoscopy has been heralded as a technological milestone in the diagnosis and therapeutics of gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. The location and position of the capsule within the GI tract are important information for subsequent surgical intervention or local drug delivery. Accurate information of capsule location is therefore required during endoscopy. Although radio frequency (RF)-based, magnetic tracking and video localization have been investigated in the past, the complexity of those systems and potential inaccuracy in the localization data necessitate the scope for further research. This article proposes the dual use of a wireless power transfer (WPT) configuration as a method to enable the determination of the location of an endoscopic capsule. Measurements conducted on a homogeneous agar-based liquid phantom predict a maximum error of 12% between the calculated and measured trajectories of the capsule in a working volume of 100 mm x 100 mm x 100 mm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据