4.6 Article

Perspectives on Spain's legislative experience providing access to healthcare to irregular migrants: a qualitative interview study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050204

关键词

health policy; public health; international health services; qualitative research

资金

  1. University of California San Francisco
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health through UCSF-CTSI [UL1 TR001872]
  3. Fulbright-Schuman Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the legislative and administrative barriers to the implementation of a national law in Spain that increased healthcare access for all residents, including undocumented migrants. Interviews with healthcare providers and administrators revealed eight key themes, including challenges with residency requirements, conflicts between national and autonomous community governments, and the rise of NGOs providing support to irregular migrants. There is a need to clarify legal entitlements and create administrative consistency across autonomous communities to improve healthcare access for undocumented migrants in Spain. Lessons from the Spanish experience can be applied to other countries struggling with similar issues.
Objectives In 2018, Spain adopted a national law that significantly expanded healthcare access to all residents, including undocumented migrants. This was a substantial shift from a more restrictive system of coverage in previous years. However, irregular migrants continue to experience challenges accessing healthcare in Spain. This study aimed to describe the legislative and administrative barriers to implementation of this law from the perspective of providers and administrators of the healthcare system. Design We interviewed 12 individuals using a semistructured format. Setting Spain. Participants 12 participants were interviewed; 7 males, 5 females. Participants included Spanish healthcare workers, government officials, hospital administrators, individuals working with non-governmental organisations focused on the provision of healthcare, and experts studying healthcare for underserved populations. Primary and secondary outcome measures Interviews delved into personal experiences and knowledge of the entitlements and barriers of providing or trying to access care for undocumented migrants. Results The interviews yielded eight key themes: (1) context of universal healthcare in Spain pre-2012; (2) erosion of trust as rationale for more restrictive policies of 2012; (3) challenges of the 3-month residency requirement; (4) areas of ambiguity: exceptions in the 2012 Royal Decree Law not discussed in the 2018 Royal Decree Law; (5) jurisdictional authority and conflicts between national and AC government; (6) near impossibility of obtaining documentation for exportation of healthcare; (7) difficulties obtaining necessary paperwork to register residency; and (8) rise of NGOs to provide support to irregular migrants. Conclusion While there has been a general political movement to expand healthcare access for undocumented migrants in Spain, there remains a fundamental need to clarify the legal entitlements for undocumented migrants nationally and create administrative consistency across autonomous communities for providing health cards for undocumented migrants. Other countries may be able to draw lessons from the Spanish experience about the legislative frameworks surrounding access to healthcare for undocumented migrants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据