4.6 Article

α-MeanShift plus plus : Improving MeanShift plus plus for Image Segmentation

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 131430-131439

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114223

关键词

Clustering; mean shift algorithm; MeanShift plus; image segmentation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant by the Korean Government through the MSIT [2021R1F1A1045749]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1F1A1045749] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MeanShift++ is an improved clustering algorithm that can partition a digital image faster and with higher accuracy compared to MeanShift. It minimizes computational redundancy by introducing a hash table and a speedup factor to reduce the number of iterations required for convergence.
MeanShift is one of the popular clustering algorithms and can be used to partition a digital image into semantically meaningful regions in an unsupervised manner. However, due to its prohibitively high computational complexity, a grid-based approach, called MeanShift++, has recently been proposed and succeeded to surprisingly reduce the computational complexity of MeanShift. Nevertheless, we found that MeanShift++ still has computational redundancy and there is room for improvement in terms of accuracy and runtime; thus, we propose an improvement to MeanShift++, named alpha-MeanShift++. We first attempt to minimize the computational redundancy by using an additional hash table. Then, we introduce a speedup factor (alpha) to reduce the number of iterations required until convergence, and we use more neighboring grid cells for the same bandwidth to improve accuracy. Through intensive experiments on image segmentation benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that alpha-MeanShift++ can run 4.1-4.6 x faster on average (but up to 7 x) than MeanShift CC and achieve better image segmentation quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据