4.5 Review

Impact vibration behavior of railway vehicles: a state-of-the-art overview

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA SINICA
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1193-1221

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10409-021-01140-9

关键词

Impact excitation; Vibration characteristics; Railway vehicle; Utilization and mitigation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2020YFA0710902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11772275, U19A20110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of recent studies on the impact vibration behavior of railway vehicles, categorizing sources of impact excitations, introducing research approaches of vehicle impact vibration, and examining impact vibration response characteristics. The results show that excessive vibrations of railway vehicles induced by dynamic impact loadings have a significant impact on train operating safety and stability, which are difficult to eliminate due to the complexity and diversity of railway lines and service environment.
Excessive vibrations of railway vehicles induced by dynamic impact loadings have a significant impact on train operating safety and stability; however, due to the complexity and diversity of railway lines and service environment, they are extremely difficult to eliminate. A comprehensive overview of recent studies on the impact vibration behavior of railway vehicles was given in this paper. First, the sources of impact excitations were categorized in terms of wheel-rail contact irregularity, aerodynamic loads, and longitudinal impulses by train traction/braking. Then the main research approaches of vehicle impact vibration were briefly introduced in theoretical, experimental, and simulation aspects. Also, the impact vibration response characteristics of railway vehicles were categorized and examined in detail to various impact excitation sources. Finally, some attempts of using the railway vehicle vibration to detect track defects and the possible mitigation measures were outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据