3.8 Article

Considerations in Management for Trans and Gender Diverse Patients with Inherited Cancer Risk

期刊

CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 59-69

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40142-021-00201-6

关键词

Cancer risk; Transgender; Genetics; Personalised care

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK through the CanGene-CanVar research programme
  2. NHS Central and South GMSA
  3. NHS Wales
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Pfizer Genomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the research mentioned above, tailored risk assessments and management recommendations need to be provided for transgender patients, multidisciplinary teams should be established to make shared decisions with patients, and national guidelines are required to standardize discussions on risk-reducing options and screening.
Purpose of Review To best support all patients with inherited cancer risk, we must broaden our scope of practice to consider the needs of the transgender and gender diverse (trans) community. We considered best practice for supporting trans patients including tailored risk assessments and management recommendations. Recent Findings There is limited literature considering trans patient care in cancer genetics. Small case studies have highlighted how medical transition and cancer risk-reducing options intersect with the need for individualised care. Studies have also shown that cancer genetics professionals do not feel prepared to support trans patients. Patient-centred care for trans patients relies on a multidisciplinary team (MDT) engaged in shared decision-making. National guidelines are needed to standardise access to appropriate discussions around risk-reducing options and screening. International collaborative research is required to provide empiric data on the impact of gender-affirming treatments on cancer risk, and more experiential data is needed from trans patients accessing cancer genetics services. Finally, education and training in this area should be formally embedded for all cancer genetics professionals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据