3.8 Article

Forging connections, pursuing social justice: a tribute to Maarten Bavinck's conceptual and institution-building contributions to maritime studies

期刊

MARITIME STUDIES
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 449-458

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40152-021-00243-0

关键词

Maarten Bavinck; Legal pluralism; Interactive governance; Fisheries conflicts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maarten Bavinck has made significant contributions to maritime studies and has inspired many with his ability to build bridges between people and ideas. His research spans legal pluralism, interactive governance, fisheries conflicts, and the environment-development interface, with a common focus on achieving social justice and making practical connections.
This paper is written in recognition of the contributions that Maarten Bavinck has made to the field of maritime studies and for the inspiration that he has been for many. It is hard to separate Maarten's academic and institution-building contributions from his personal qualities, particularly his interest in human relationships. Maarten's aptitude for building bridges between people, ideas, and institutions has allowed him to connect people in larger knowledge generation and action projects and forge new conceptual bridges. In addition to reflecting shortly on Maarten's key role in establishing the Centre for Maritime Research (MARE) as a institutional anchor in maritime studies, this paper reviews on some of his important and original contributions to four academic domains: legal pluralism, interactive governance, the study of fisheries conflicts, and the environment-development interface. Common threads across these domains include his long-term commitment to meticulous fieldwork in South Asia that grounds his work so firmly, his focus on achieving a more socially just use of marine and coastal resources, and his pragmatic approach that has led to original connections across distinct conceptual and institutional fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据