4.5 Review

Implications of prognosis-associated genes in pancreatic tumor metastasis: lessons from global studies in bioinformatics

期刊

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 721-738

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-021-09991-1

关键词

Molecular markers; Prognosis; Metastasis; Survival

类别

资金

  1. NIH [P01 CA217798, R01 CA183459, CA210637, R01 CA228524, U01 CA200466, U01 CA210240, R44CA224619]
  2. Nebraska State Department of Health & Human Services, NRI collaboration initiative grant [LB506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy with poor prognosis mainly due to metastasis. Global studies utilizing computational methods have identified prognostic and metastatic genes, leading to the development of new treatment modalities.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. The occurrence of metastasis, among other hallmarks, is the main contributor to its poor prognosis. Consequently, the elucidation of metastatic genes involved in the aggressive nature of the disease and its poor prognosis will result in the development of new treatment modalities for improved management of PC. There is a deep interest in understanding underlying disease pathology, identifying key prognostic genes, and genes associated with metastasis. Computational approaches, which have become increasingly relevant over the last decade, are commonly used to explore such interests. This review aims to address global studies that have employed global approaches to identify prognostic and metastatic genes, while highlighting their methods and limitations. A panel of 48 prognostic genes were identified across these studies, but only five, including ANLN, ARNTL2, PLAU, TOP2A, and VCAN, were validated in multiple studies and associated with metastasis. Their association with metastasis has been further explored here, and the implications of these genes in the metastatic cascade have been interpreted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据