4.5 Article

Hotspot Analysis of Structure Fires in Urban Agglomeration: A Case of Nagpur City, India

期刊

FIRE-SWITZERLAND
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fire4030038

关键词

fire incidence; hotspot analysis; KDE; Getis-Ord Gi*; IDW interpolation; fire risk zones; built-up areas; temporal analysis; sustainable development

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fire Service is a crucial civic service for protecting citizens from major losses, and hotspot analysis helps estimate at-risk people and property, aiding decision-makers in implementing effective fire prevention and protection measures.
Fire Service is the fundamental civic service to protect citizens from irrecoverable, heavy losses of lives and property. Hotspot analysis of structure fires is essential to estimate people and property at risk. Hotspot analysis for the peak period of last decade, using a GIS-based spatial analyst and statistical techniques through the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) and Getis-Ord Gi* with Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation is performed, revealing fire risk zones at the city ward micro level. Using remote sensing, outputs of hotspot analysis are integrated with the built environment of Land Use Land Cover (LULC) to quantify the accurate built-up areas and population density of identified fire risk zones. KDE delineates 34 wards as hotspots, while Getis-Ord Gi* delineates 17 wards within the KDE hotspot, the central core areas having the highest built-up and population density. A temporal analysis reveals the maximum fires on Thursday during the hot afternoon hours from 12 noon to 5 p.m. The study outputs help decision makers for effective fire prevention and protection by deploying immediate resource allocations and proactive planning reassuring sustainable urban development. Furthermore, updating the requirement of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) to build urban resilient infrastructure in accord with the Smart City Mission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据