4.6 Review

Bone turnover markers: are they clinically useful?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 R19-R31

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-17-0585

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Alexion
  4. Immunodiagnostic Systems
  5. Roche
  6. Lilly
  7. D3 Biomedical Science Institutes
  8. GSK Nutrition
  9. Warner-Chilcott
  10. GSK
  11. Prostrakan
  12. Internis Pharma
  13. MRC [MR/K006312/1, MR/P020941/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are useful in clinical practice as they are inexpensive, and they have proven useful for treatment monitoring and identification of poor adherence. BTMs cannot be used in individual patients for identifying accelerated bone loss or an increase in fracture risk or in deciding on the optimal therapy. They are useful for monitoring both anti-resorptive and anabolic treatment. Response can be defined as a result that exceeds an absolute target, or by a change greater than the least significant change; if such a response is not present, then poor compliance or secondary osteoporosis are likely causes. A baseline BTM measurement is not always made; in that case, a value of BTM on anti-resorptive treatment that is low or low normal or above the reference interval for anabolic therapy may be taken to indicate a satisfactory response. We provide an approach to using these bone turnover markers in clinical practice by describing algorithms for anti-resorptive and anabolic therapy and describing the changes we observe in the clinical practice setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据