4.1 Article

Educational effects using a robot patient simulation system for development of clinical attitude

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 E327-E336

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eje.12298

关键词

clinical attitude; consideration; robot patient simulation system; traditional mannequin; treatment skill

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of improving the attitude of dental students towards the use of a full-body patient simulation system (SIMROID) compared to the traditional mannequin (CLINSIM) for dental clinical education. Materials and methodsThe participants were 10 male undergraduate dental students who had finished clinical training in the university hospital 1year before this study started. They performed a crown preparation on an upper pre-molar tooth using SIMROID and CLINSIM as the practical clinical trials. The elapsed time for preparation was recorded. The taper of the abutment teeth was measured using a 3-dimensional shape-measuring device after this trial. In addition, a self-reported questionnaire was collected that included physical pain, treatment safety and maintaining a clean area for each simulator. Qualitative data analysis of a free format report about SIMROID was performed using text mining analysis. This trial was performed twice at 1-month intervals. ResultsThe students considered physical pain, treatment safety and a clean area for SIMROID significantly better than that for CLINSIM (P<.01). The elapsed time of preparation in the second practical clinical trial was significantly lower than in the first for SIMROID and CLINSIM (P<.01). However, there were no significant differences between the abutment tapers for both systems. For the text mining analysis, most of the students wrote that SIMROID was similar to real patients. ConclusionThe use of SIMROID was proven to be effective in improving the attitude of students towards patients, thereby giving importance to considerations for actual patients during dental treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据