4.6 Article

Demonstration of 1 → 3 continuous-variable quantum telecloning

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032419

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [62027821, 11654002, 11804206, 11804207, 11874250, 62035015]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFC2200402]
  3. Key Research and Development Projects of Shanxi [201903D111001]
  4. Program for Sanjin Scholar of Shanxi Province
  5. Program for Outstanding Innovative Teams of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi
  6. Fund for Shanxi 1331 Project Key Subjects Construction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experiment demonstrates unconditional 1 -> 3 quantum telecloning of coherent states, with fidelities of the cloned states at 0.64 +/- 0.01, 0.64 +/- 0.01, and 0.49 +/- 0.01, respectively. The use of quadripartite entangled modes as an auxiliary resource ensures that no information about the unknown state is lost during the telecloning process. Deterministic 1 -> 3 quantum telecloning shows great potential for applications in advanced quantum technology.
The distribution of the quantum states to remote receivers is an indispensable technology in quantum communication, quantum networks, and quantum information processing. Perfect distribution does not allow any quantum information loss of the distributed quantum state. Quantum telecloning, which is made up of quantum cloning and quantum teleportation, is a remote quantum information distribution protocol. Here, we experimentally demonstrate unconditional 1 -> 3 quantum telecloning of coherent states, and the fidelities of the cloned states are 0.64 +/- 0.01, 0.64 +/- 0.01, and 0.49 +/- 0.01, respectively. No information about the unknown state is lost during the telecloning process by exploiting the quadripartite entangled modes as an auxiliary resource. Deterministic 1 -> 3 quantum telecloning has great potential for applications in advanced quantum technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据