4.7 Article

sp-Hybridized nitrogen doped graphdiyne for high-performance Zn-air batteries

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 5, 期 22, 页码 7987-7992

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qm01137e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0703504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51932001, 21971244]
  3. Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program [BX20190331]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M670457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By selectively doping sp-N heteroatoms into GDY, the electrocatalytic activity and durability of Zn-air batteries can be significantly improved. This precisely constructed material shows outstanding performance as an air cathode, surpassing that of commercial catalysts and demonstrating robust stability.
Zn-air batteries have drawn extensive attention owing to their high specific energy, light weight, convenient operation, and environmental friendliness. However, their practical application remains a challenge due to unsatisfactory performance and high-cost. Engineering highly efficient electrocatalysts, especially metal-free ones, for Zn-air batteries is crucially important. Doping heteroatoms can provide more active sites by the modification of electron distribution, and thus the rational design of the doping form and amount is an effective approach for performance enhancement. Herein, the unique sp-hybridized nitrogen atoms (sp-N) are site-specifically doped into graphdiyne (GDY) at a higher amount and with good selectivity. The precisely constructed sp-N doped GDY displays superior electrocatalytic activity and durability, which make it a distinctive air cathode for Zn-air batteries. Importantly, as an air cathode, sp-N doped GDY displays outstanding performance and robust stability, affording a peak power density of 195.7 mW cm(-2), exceeding that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst (180.3 mW cm(-2)), and prominent stability. This work provides an extraordinary route for advancing metal-air cathode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据