4.6 Article

A highly selective AIEgen fluorescent probe for visualizing Cys in living cells and C. elegans

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 40, 页码 19073-19081

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj03701c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nanjing University Institute of Artificial Intelligence Biomedical Research [AM2020009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel fluorescent probe, PE-YW, was designed for selectively detecting Cys by regulating its AIE-based effects. The probe utilized a specific conjugate addition cyclization reaction between Cys and an acrylate moiety to induce fluorescence turn-on. PE-YW showed high selectivity, low detection limit, and excellent performance for detecting Cys in living systems.
As essential biological thiols in organisms, Cys, Hcy, and GSH are closely related to each other, and they can be involved in various pathological processes if expression levels are abnormal. It is a challenge to develop effective fluorescence-based tools to selectively distinguish Cys from Hcy and GSH because of their common functional groups. For most existing Cys fluorescent probes, their application is greatly restricted by the influence of aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ). In this work, a novel fluorescent probe, PE-YW, for Cys was designed rationally via regulating its AIE-based effects. The probe PE-YW took advantage of a specific conjugate addition cyclization reaction between Cys and an acrylate moiety, inducing the aggregation of PE-OH and showing large turn-on fluorescence (about 7-fold). The probe could detect Cys over other amino acids with high selectivity and a low detection limit (LOD = 1.72 nM). In addition, PE-YW exhibited excellent performance, such as a high fluorescence quantum yield (delta = 0.8) and a fast response toward Cys (<20 min). Furthermore, PE-YW was used for fluorescence imaging in living HeLa cells and C. elegans. The results suggested that PE-YW was a suitable and potential fluorescence-based tool for detecting Cys in living systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据