4.5 Article

Virulence factors of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and the risk of developing haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Norway, 1992-2013

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2974-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) may cause haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). Age ae5 years and presence of stx2a and eae are risk factors for the development of HUS. In this study, we investigated STEC isolates for the presence of adhesins, toxins and molecular risk assessment (MRA) factors to identify virulence genes associated with HUS development. We included non-duplicate isolates from all STEC infections (n = 340, HUS = 32) reported to the Norwegian National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for Enteropathogenic Bacteria from 1992 to 2013. The most common STEC were O157:H7/H- (34%) and O103:H2 (14%). We retrospectively screened the isolates by three multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) for adhesins (n = 11), toxins (n = 5) and MRA (n = 15). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for associations with HUS development. On average, isolates were positive for 15 virulence genes (range: 1-24); two toxins (range: 0-4), five adhesins (range: 0-8) and eight MRA genes (range: 0-13). The gene combinations were clustered within serotypes. Isolates from HUS cases were positive for eae and IpfA (O26), and negative for saa, eibG, astA, cnf, subA and pic. We identified 11 virulence genes with a significant association to HUS development. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age group and Shiga toxin identified nleH1-2 [aOR 8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI); 2.18-32.3] as an independent risk factor for the development of HUS from an STEC infection. This study demonstrated that the non-LEE effector protein nleH1-2 may be an important predictor for elevated risk of developing HUS from STEC infections. We recommend the NRL for Enteropathogenic Bacteria to consider including nleH1-2 screening as part of routine STEC surveillance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据