4.2 Article

Evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis as toxic sugar bait against adult Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes

期刊

JOURNAL OF VECTOR ECOLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 30-33

出版社

SOC VECTOR ECOLOGY

关键词

Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis; toxic sugar bait; Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; Culex quinquefasciatus; sugar-feeding

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Southeastern Regional Center of Excellence in Vector Borne Disease: The Gateway Program
  2. CDC [1U01CK00510-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) are a novel and effective mosquito control tool that targets adult Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus based on their sugar-feeding behaviors and oral ingestion. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (BTi) shows promising results as an active ingredient in toxic sugar baits (TSB), with high mortality rates for the targeted mosquito species. The study suggests that ingestible BTi TSBs could be a viable alternative to current mosquito control strategies for these three species of mosquitoes.
Attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) are a novel and effective mosquito control tool based on sugar-feeding behaviors and oral ingestion. In general, there is a demand from consumers for more novel control products with more effective active ingredients. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (BTi) is a major larvicide for control of mosquito larvae. This study evaluated BTi as an active ingredient of toxic sugar baits (TSB) against adult Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus, compared with a positive control of 1% boric acid toxic sugar bait. Ingestion of BTi TSB by female mosquitoes resulted in an average mortality at 48 h of 97% for Ae. aegypti, 98% for Ae. albopictus, and 100% for Cx. quinquefasciatus. The study findings suggest ingestible BTi TSBs could be a viable alternative to current mosquito control strategies and programs against adults of these three species of mosquitoes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据