4.6 Article

Ventricular mechanics after repair of subarterial and perimembranous VSDs

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12852

关键词

myocardial strain; ventricular function; ventricular septal defect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundEmerging data suggest impaired biventricular function in adults late after repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD). We assessed and compared right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) mechanics in adolescents and adults after surgical closure of doubly committed subarterial and perimembranous VSDs. MethodsA total of 75 subjects were studied: 29 patients after subarterial VSD repair (group I), 17 patients after perimembranous VSD repair (group II) and 29 age-matched controls (group III). RV and LV mechanics were assessed using tissue Doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography, while RV outflow systolic function was quantified by systolic excursion and fractional shortening (FS). ResultsCompared with group III, groups I and II had significantly reduced tricuspid annular systolic and diastolic velocities, isovolumic myocardial acceleration, RV global longitudinal systolic and diastolic deformation parameters and RV outflow systolic excursion (all P < .05). Group I, but not II, had reduced RV outflow FS (P = .008) and the lowest global LV longitudinal systolic strain (P = .008) and systolic strain rate (P = .014). In group I, postoperative aortic regurgitation was associated with lower LV longitudinal systolic strain (P = .009) and early diastolic strain rate (P = .002), while right bundle branch block was associated with lower RV systolic strain rate (P = .048). As a group, RV outflow excursion (P < .001) and FS (P = .001) were correlated with LV global systolic strain. ConclusionAdolescents and adults late after repair of subarterial and perimembranous VSDs show impairment of RV systolic and diastolic myocardial deformation. The RV outflow function and LV systolic deformation appear to be worse after repair of subarterial defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据