4.7 Article

Techno-environmental-economic evaluation on municipal solid waste (MSW) to power/fuel by gasification-based and incineration-based routes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106108

关键词

Municipal solid waste; Gasification; Incineration; Techno-environmental-economic evaluation; Recycling

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1901203]
  2. Guangzhou Science and Technology Innovation Development Special Fund [202002030105]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019MS017]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672626]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the techno-environmental-economic performance of Waste-to-Power and Waste-to-Fuel technologies, with the results showing MTH and MTNG processes to be more efficient, environmentally friendly, and economically advantageous compared to other options.
The energy cascade utilization of municipal solid waste (MSW) is an important subject to realize sustainable development. The gasification-based option has shown great potential in resource recovery with high-efficiency conversion. In this study, the techno-environmental-economic performance of Waste-to-Power (WtP) and Wasteto-Fuel (WtF) technologies, including MSW integrated gasification combined cycle (MIGCC), MSW-to-hydrogen (MTH), MSW-to-synthetic natural gas (MTNG) and MSW incineration to energy (MTE), is analyzed and evaluated based on the Aspen Plus simulation. The results show that MTH process owns the highest exergy efficiency with 46.7%, followed by MTNG (43.7%), MIGCC (28.6%) and MTE (18.9%). The MTH and MTNG processes appear to be more environmentally friendly than MTE in terms of global warming potential (GWP). The levelized profit of MSW (LPOM) for MIGCC process is the lowest under current market conditions. By comparison, the MTH process exhibits the best economic performance in resisting the fluctuation of electricity sales tariff, carbon tax and MSW subsidy price. In addition, MTH process could be regarded as a promising alternative path to produce hydrogen because of its economic advantage than coal-to-hydrogen and biomass-to-hydrogen processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据