4.7 Article

Flexible supercapacitors of biomass-based activated carbon-polypyrrole on eggshell membranes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106155

关键词

Activated carbon; Polypyrrole; Supercapacitor; Flexible device; Eggshell membrane

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil) [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE, Brazil)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - (CNPq, Brazil)
  4. Bio4Energy, a Strategic Research Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed biomass-based supercapacitors for application in advanced electronic devices with flexible structures, achieving promising results in terms of areal capacitance, energy density, power density, and cycle retention after 1000 cycles. By varying the amount of polypyrrole during its polymerization process, the competition between activated carbon and the hybrid device was controlled, showing the potential for improved performance in flexible membrane-like supercapacitors.
The quest to develop flexible membrane-like supercapacitors to be applied in advanced electronic devices with a flexible structure is important for the modern world. In this study, we developed biomass-based supercapacitors by depositing activated carbon on an eggshell membrane and subsequently coating these with polypyrrole in a two-step procedure. The competition between the electrical double layer capacitance (EDLC) from activated carbon and the pseudocapacitance (PC) for the hybrid device is controlled by varying the amount of polypyrrole (PC component) in a time-dependent polymerization process. An areal capacitance of 172.5 mF cm(-2), a corresponding energy density of 4.73 W h kg(-1), and power density of 320.8 W kg(-1), with a 60% retention even after 1000 cycles were obtained for samples prepared with the polymerization of polypyrrole on the activated carbon (incorporation of an active layer of 3.18 mg cm(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据