4.3 Article

How data shape actor relations in artificial intelligence innovation systems: an empirical observation from China

期刊

INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 251-267

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtaa063

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020AAA0105300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71810107004, 71774097]
  3. Tsinghua University Independent Research Program [2019THZW]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the possibility and ways in which data reshape government-industry-university relations in the era of AI, using China's AI innovation system as a case study to investigate the dynamics of actor relations in the business, knowledge, and regulatory subsystems. The transition from physical resources to virtual data in AI innovation systems has significantly altered the relationships among industry, state, and academia, with digital platforms increasingly playing a crucial role in value creation, knowledge generation, and regulation formation in the face of uncertainty.
With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), data are widely viewed as the new oil. However, data substantially differ from conventional resources in the sense that they are important not only for production but also for knowledge development and public policymaking. This article explores whether and how data reshape government-industry-university relations in the era of AI. Taking China's AI innovation system as a case, this article investigates the dynamics of actor relations in the business subsystem, knowledge subsystem, and regulatory subsystem. The change of the fundamental input from physical resources to virtual data in AI innovation systems has significantly transformed the relations among industry, state, and academia, and digital platforms are playing an increasingly important role in business value creation, knowledge generation, and regulation formation due to their control of valuable data and frontier expertise in the context of uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据