4.7 Article

The combination effects of K2O and PbO poisoning on NH3-SCR TiO2-CeO2 catalyst

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106127

关键词

TiO2-CeO2 catalyst; NH3-SCR; Poisoning; Reaction mechanism

资金

  1. Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Special Project [cstc2019jscx-gksbX0022, cstc2019jscx-fxydX0009, cstc2019jscx-gksbX0045]
  2. State Power Investment Cor-poration Yuanda Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd [H20190007, H20181197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the poisoning effects of K2O and PbO on the NH3-SCR performance of TiO2-CeO2 catalyst, and found a stronger toxicity when both were introduced simultaneously, hindering electron transfer and surface acidity. Furthermore, the combination of K and Pb reduced the activation performance of NOx species and did not alter the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism of the catalyst.
TiO2-CeO2 catalyst is a promising material for removal of NOx by NH3-SCR reaction. The poisonous substances existing in flue gas cause serious deactivation of the catalyst. However, most of the researches had focused on the effect of a single toxic component, while the actual flue gas contains multiple toxic components. In this work, the combination of K2O and PbO poisoning effects on NH3-SCR performance over the TiO2-CeO2 catalyst were investigated. A stronger poisonousness was found when K2O and PbO were simultaneously introduced. The characterization results showed that the coexistence of K2O and PbO hinder the transfer of electrons between TiO2 and CeO2, and worsen the decrease of surface adsorbed oxygen, the relative ratio of Ce3+, as well as the surface acidity. In situ DRIFTS results showed that the decrease of Bronsted acid caused by K and Pb was larger than Lewis acid. Additionally, the combination of K and Pb reduced the activation performance of NOx species. Finally, the TiO2-CeO2 catalyst's Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) mechanism did not change when K and Pb were introduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据