4.6 Article

Non-polar GaN/AlGaN quantum-well polariton laser at room temperature

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.125311

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  2. European Union (European Social Fund) [MIS 5048530]
  3. French ANR project UVLASE [ANR-18-CE24-0014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates room temperature polariton lasing in an all-dielectric microcavity with non-polar III-nitride quantum wells as active media. The microcavity fabrication method involves detaching an optimally grown III-nitride active region from the substrate and inserting it between distributed Bragg reflectors. The produced microcavities exhibit closely spaced polarization-resolved lower polariton branches, with polariton lasing observed at a lower threshold compared to previous technology levels.
We demonstrate room temperature (RT) polariton lasing in an all-dielectric microcavity containing non-polar III-nitride quantum wells (QWs) as active media. The microcavity is fabricated using the photo-electrochemical etching method, by which an optimally grown m-plane III-nitride active region is detached from the substrate in the form of a membrane, which is subsequently inserted between two SiO2/Ta2O5 distributed Bragg reflectors, with 4 and 10 pairs for the top and bottom mirrors, respectively. The active region consists of 25 GaN/Al0.1Ga0.9N (5 nm/3 nm) QWs. The produced microcavities exhibit two closely spaced polarization-resolved lower polariton branches at RT, in line with the selection rules of the non-polar orientation, having a Rabi splitting of 62 and 72 meV in the E parallel to a and E parallel to c polarizations, respectively. In a positively detuned 3 lambda/2-thick microcavity, polariton lasing is observed at ambient conditions in the E parallel to a polarization, with a threshold similar to 3 times lower than previous state of the art, despite the use of a relatively weak top reflector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据