4.6 Article

Testing complementarity on a transmon quantum processor

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032223

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BD/150708/2020]
  2. FCT [UTAPEXPL/NTec/0046/2017]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo2017/139]
  4. MINECO [PID2019109539GB]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/150708/2020] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, quantum circuits are proposed to test interferometric complementarity, with experiments conducted in two different setups to explore the balance between visibility and distinguishability. Despite good agreement with theory at a coarse level, small systematic deviations were identified, preventing the observation of full particlelike and wavelike statistics. These deviations were attributed to small coherent errors in the implementation of two-qubit gates, which hinder the observation of Bohr's strong formulation of complementarity.
We propose quantum circuits to test interferometric complementarity using symmetric two-way interferometers coupled to a which-path detector. First, we consider the two-qubit setup in which the controlled transfer of path information to the detector subsystem depletes interference on the probed subspace, testing the visibility-distinguishability tradeoff via minimum-error state discrimination measurements. Next, we consider the quantum eraser setup, in which reading out path information in the right basis recovers an interference pattern. These experiments are then carried out in an IBM superconducting transmon processor. A detailed analysis of the results is provided. Despite finding good agreement with theory at a coarse level, we also identify small but persistent systematic deviations preventing the observation of full particlelike and wavelike statistics. We understand them by carefully modeling two-qubit gates, showing that even small coherent errors in their implementation preclude the observation of Bohr's strong formulation of complementarity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据