4.6 Article

Meron-antimeron crystals in noncentrosymmetric itinerant magnets on a triangular lattice

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094425

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K03752, JP19H01834, JP21H01037]
  2. JST PRESTO [JPMJPR20L8]
  3. Forefront Physics and Mathematics Program to Drive Transformation (FoPM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a theoretical investigation on a multiple-Q state with topological defects, called a meron-antimeron crystal (MAX), was conducted. Through simulated annealing, the stability of rectangular-shaped and triangular-shaped MAXs was demonstrated, along with the highly anisotropic responses to a magnetic field on the triangular MAX. These findings suggest the potential for further experimental exploration of MAXs in itinerant magnets.
Multiple-Q magnetic states often induce nontrivial topological spin textures, such as a skyrmion and a hedgehog. We theoretically investigate yet another multiple-Q state with topological defects, a meron-antimeron crystal (MAX), represented by a periodic array of the meron and antimeron with a half-integer skyrmion number. Performing simulated annealing for an effective spin model of noncentrosymmetric itinerant magnets on a triangular lattice, we show that rectangular-shaped and triangular-shaped MAXs are stabilized by the interplay between the biquadratic interaction arising from the spin-charge coupling and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction arising from the spin-orbit coupling. We also discuss the effect of a magnetic field on the triangular MAX, where highly anisotropic responses against a field direction are found. In particular, we show that the triangular MAX turns into the skyrmion crystal for the fields along the y and z directions, while it is replaced by another chiral state for the field along the x direction. These results should inspire further experimental investigation of MAXs in itinerant magnets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据