4.7 Review

Significance of re-engineered zeolites in climate mitigation - A review for carbon capture and separation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105957

关键词

Carbon sequestration; Carbon utilization; Atmosphere chemistry; Environment mitigation

资金

  1. Amity Institute of Click Chemistry Research and Studies, Amity University Uttar Pradesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the context of modern science, there is a growing interest in the creation of novel porous materials capable of acting as sorbefacients for small gas molecules. Zeolite, due to its high porosity, ultra-small pores, structural diversity, high stability, and excellent recyclability, has been identified as a potential prototype for CO2 sorption. Researchers are focusing on re-engineering zeolites for selective CO2 capture and storage, with progress indicating fast removal of CO2 and potential for further improvement in scalability, energy efficiency, and time efficiency.
In the context of modern science, there is a growing interest in the creation of novel porous materials capable of acting as sorbefacients for small gas molecules. This is critical in terms of innovative energy alternatives as well as a healthier environment. In an effort to overcome the consequences of global industrialization, one of humanity's most severe problems, intensive attempts have been made to prevent CO2 from entering the carbon cycle, as the ever-increasing CO2 pollution in the earth's atmosphere. Owing to their high porosity, presence of ultra-small pores, structural diversity, high stability, and excellent recyclability, researchers claim that zeolite-an inexpensively accessible sorbent-could be an excellent prototype for CO2 sorption. Here, we provide an exhaustive review of re-engineered zeolites as a sustainable material for selective CO2 capture and storage; the progress so far indicates fast removal of CO2, and more work conforming to simple scalability, energy and time efficiency application can be done to improve the challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据