4.1 Article

Predictions of elemental composition of coal and biomass from their proximate analyses using ANFIS, ANN and MLR

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40789-020-00346-9

关键词

Biomass; Coal; Elemental composition; Proximate analysis; Soft computing; Regression analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, predictive models for the elemental composition of coal and biomass were developed using soft computing and regression analyses. Multiple prediction models were established using samples and various prediction performance indices were used to test the reliability of the models, which were found to be satisfactory for practical purposes.
The elemental composition of coal and biomass provides significant parameters used in the design of almost all energy conversion systems and projects. The laboratory tests to determine the elemental composition of coal and biomass is time-consuming and costly. However, limited research has suggested that there is a correlation between parameters obtained from elemental and proximate analyses of these materials. In this study, some predictive models of the elemental composition of coal and biomass using soft computing and regression analyses have been developed. Thirty-one samples including parameters of elemental and proximate analyses were used during the analyses to develop multiple prediction models. Dependent variables for multiple prediction models were selected as carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Using volatile matter, fixed carbon, moisture and ash contents as independent variables, three different prediction models were developed for each dependent parameter using ANFIS, ANN, and MLR. In addition, a routine for selecting the best predictive model was suggested in the study. The reliability of the established models was tested by using various prediction performance indices and the models were found to be satisfactory. Therefore, the developed models can be used to determine the elemental composition of coal and biomass for practical purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据