4.6 Article

An ink-jet printed dual-CD ratiometric fluorescent paper-based sensor for the visual detection of Cu2+

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 52, 页码 33036-33047

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05592e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent and Green Flexographic printing [ZBKT202002, ZBKT201903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized a dual-carbon dots ratiometric fluorescent paper-based sensor to achieve qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of Cu2+, improving the photoluminescence quantum yield, enhancing detection sensitivity, and exploring a new pathway for visual detection of Cu2+.
Copper ion (Cu2+) plays an important role in the human body because it is beneficial for metabolism. However, an excessive or slight amount of Cu2+ can cause various symptoms. Therefore, it is necessary for human health to realize the trace and visual detection of Cu2+. Referring to traditional fluorescence test papers, the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of Cu2+ could be realized by a dual-carbon dots (CDs) ratiometric fluorescent paper-based sensor with the advantages of environmental protection, portability and low cost. In this paper, the inkjet-printed test paper with the best mixing ratio of the two CDs has been researched to maximize the spectral energy transfer of ion detection (maximum color gamut expansion). Among them, the preparation method of b-CDs has been improved, increasing the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) to 88.9%. The sensitivity detection limit of the double emission ratio sensor was 0.15 nM in solution, and the human eye can distinguish at least 3 mu mol L-1 Cu2+ in the paper-based sensor. Compared with the traditional single-emission sensor, the human eye was more sensitive to the color change of the emission ratio sensor. The results indicate that we not only realized the micro detection of Cu2+ with convenient methods, but also provided a promising strategy for the visual detection of Cu2+.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据