4.8 Article

Tanycytic networks mediate energy balance by feeding lactate to glucose-insensitive POMC neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 131, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI140521

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) Synergy Grant [810331, ID656657, 748134]
  2. Region Hauts-de-France Vision AIRR [189090]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [810331] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [748134] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tanycytes in the hypothalamus convert brain glucose into lactate and transmit it to proopiomelanocortin neurons, driving their activity and metabolic response. This transmission relies on the formation of metabolic networks and plays a key role in regulating feeding behavior and energy metabolism.
Hypothalamic glucose sensing enables an organism to match energy expenditure and food intake to circulating levels of glucose, the main energy source of the brain. Here, we established that tanycytes of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, specialized glia that line the wall of the third ventricle, convert brain glucose supplies into lactate that they transmit through monocarboxylate transporters to arcuate proopiomelanocortin neurons, which integrate this signal to drive their activity and to adapt the metabolic response to meet physiological demands. Furthermore, this transmission required the formation of extensive connexin-43 gap junction-mediated metabolic networks by arcuate tanycytes. Selective suppression of either tanycytic monocarboxylate transporters or gap junctions resulted in altered feeding behavior and energy metabolism. Tanycytic intercellular communication and lactate production are thus integral to the mechanism by which hypothalamic neurons that regulate energy and glucose homeostasis efficiently perceive alterations in systemic glucose levels as a function of the physiological state of the organism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据