4.3 Review

Parallels between enzyme catalysis, electrocatalysis, and photoelectrosynthesis

期刊

CHEM CATALYSIS
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 978-996

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.checat.2021.09.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1653982]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0021186]
  3. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program
  4. IGERT-SUN fellowship - National Science Foundation [1144616]
  5. Phoenix Chapter of the ARCS Foundation
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021186] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [1653982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalysts play a central role in accelerating chemical reactions in biology and technology, but research on photoelectrosynthetic reactions has not been as rigorously pursued as in other areas. This perspective draws parallels between enzyme catalytic efficiency, benchmarking of molecular electrocatalysts, and the performance of photoelectrosynthetic assemblies, highlighting key differences, assumptions, and limitations.
Catalysts are central to accelerating chemistry in biology and technology. In biochemistry, the relationship between the velocity of an enzymatic reaction and the concentration of chemical substrates is described via the Michaelis- Menten model. The modeling and benchmarking of synthetic molecular electrocatalysts are also well developed. However, such efforts have not been as rigorously extended to photoelectrosynthetic reactions, where, in addition to chemical substrates and charge carriers, light is a required reagent. In this perspective, we draw parallels between concepts involving enzyme catalytic efficiency, the benchmarking of molecular electrocatalysts, and the performance of photoelectrosynthetic assemblies, while highlighting key differences, assumptions, and limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据