4.5 Article

Inclusive breakup cross sections in reactions induced by the nuclides 6He and 6, 7Li in the two-body cluster model

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034623

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/056600, 2016/07398-8, 2017/13693-5, 2019/07767-1]
  2. CNPq [306433/2017-6]
  3. INCT-FNA [464898/2014-5]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. LDRD Project [19-ERD-017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study calculates the inclusive alpha particle production induced by He-6 and Li-6, Li-7 isotopes on different target nuclei, revealing a significant contribution from inclusive breakup emission. Li-6 and Li-7 reactions show a good description of the data, while interpreting the data involving He-6 remains more complicated.
Calculations of inclusive alpha particle production are performed to interpret reaction experimental data induced by the two-neutron halo He-6 and the isotopes Li-6,Li-7 on different target nuclei. We have implemented the zero-range post-form distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) to compute the elastic and nonelastic breakup cross sections. Integrated cross sections, angular distributions, and spectra are presented. Projectiles are approximated as two-body clusters, namely He-6 as alpha+dineutron and Li-6 (Li-7) are interpreted as alpha +deuteron (triton). The Sao Paulo optical potential is employed in the calculation of the distorted wave functions for the incident channels, while standard phenomenological interactions are taken for the fragment-target interactions. Calculations for Li-6 and Li-7 furnish a good description of the data, while the reaction involving He-6 is found to be more complicated, where interpretation of the data must still be considered incomplete. The present analysis identifies an overall large contribution from inclusive breakup emission for all the cases studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据