4.2 Article

Leukocyte classification based on feature selection using extra trees classifier: a transfer learning approach

出版社

TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY
DOI: 10.3906/elk-2104-183

关键词

Extra trees classifier; deep learning; multi-class support vector machine; transfer learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on automatic detection and classification of white blood cells using deep learning models to improve accuracy and reduce time. By selecting ResNet50 features with extra trees classifier, the highest accuracy of 90.76% is achieved in multi-class SVM evaluation.
The criticality of investigating the white blood cell (WBC) count cannot be underestimated, as white blood cells are an important component of the body's defence system. From helping to diagnose hidden infections to insinuating the presence of comorbidities like immunodeficiency, an accurate white blood cell count can contribute significantly to shape a physician's assessment. The manual process performed by the pathologists for the classification of WBCs is a time consuming and tedious task, which is further disadvantaged by a lack of accuracy. This study concentrates on the automatic detection and classification of WBC without data augmentation into four subtypes such as eosinophil, monocyte, lymphocyte and neutrophil based on images from three different datasets. The methodology adopted in this paper is transfer learning approach in which the features are extracted using ResNet50, DenseNet121, MobileNetv2, Inceptionv3 and Xception deep learning models.The extra trees classifier is used as an intermediate stage for selecting most predominant features, which reduce the execution time. When evaluating the performance on the basis of recall, precision, F-measure and accuracy parameters, the classification of ResNet50 features selected by extra trees classifier using multi-class support vector machine (SVM) provides the highest accuracy of 90.76% .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据