4.1 Article

A Biopython-based method for comprehensively searching for eponyms in Pubmed

期刊

METHODSX
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101264

关键词

PubMed; Medline; Eponym; Citation; Gastrointestinal diseases; Literature search; Biopython; Bibliometrics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This method allows for rapid searching and characterization of eponyms in any medical specialty, including non-eponymous terms, by modifying an existing Biopython method. By manually collecting eponym lists, creating permutations, and automatically searching PubMed, this method efficiently enables retrieval of eponyms.
Eponyms are common in medicine; however, their usage has varied between specialties and over time. A search of specific eponyms will reveal the frequency of usage within a medical specialty. While usage of eponyms can be studied by searching PubMed, manual searching can be time-consuming. As an alternative, we modified an existing Biopython method for searching PubMed. In this method, a list of disease eponyms is first manually collected in an Excel file. A Python script then creates permutations of the eponyms that might exist in the cited literature. These permutations include possessives (e.g., 's) as well as various forms of combining multiple surnames. PubMed is then automatically searched for this permutated library of eponyms, and duplicate citations are removed. The final output file may then be sorted and enumerated by all the data fields which exist in PubMed. This method will enable rapid searching and characterization of eponyms for any specialty of medicine. This method is agnostic to the type of terms searched and can be generally applied to the medical literature including non-eponymous terms such as gene names and chemical compounds. Custom Python scripts using Biopython's Bio.Entrez module automate the search for medical eponyms. This method can be more broadly used to search for any set of terms existing in PubMed. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据