3.8 Proceedings Paper

Wireless Coded Caching With Shared Caches Can Overcome the Near-Far Bottleneck

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ISIT45174.2021.9517923

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council under the EU [725929]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [725929] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the use of coded caching in a single-cell downlink scenario, revealing that the original scheme's benefits are reduced due to varying path-loss among users. However, the utilization of shared caches can recover most of the gains. Tight approximations for average user rate and coded caching gain are derived through high-SNR approximation, which remain accurate even at low SNR levels. Simulation results validate the findings across various user settings.
We investigate the use of coded caching in the single-cell downlink scenario where the receiving users are randomly located inside the cell. We first show that, as a result of having users that experience very different path-loss, the real gain of the original coded caching scheme is severely reduced. We then prove that the use of shared caches - which, we stress, is a compulsory feature brought about by the subpacketization constraint in nearly every practical setting - introduces a spatial-averaging effect that allows us to recover most of the subpacketization-constrained gains that coded caching would have yielded in the error-free identical-link setting. For the ergodic-fading scenario with different pathloss, we derive tight approximations of the average (over the users) rate and of the coded caching gain by means of a basic high-SNR approximation on the point-to-point capacity. These derived expressions prove very accurate even for low SNR. We also provide a result based on the regime of large number of users which is nonetheless also valid for settings with few users. These results are extensively validated using Monte-Carlo simulations that adhere to 3GPP recommendations on system parameters for urban micro or macro cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据