4.8 Article

COVID-19 cynomolgus macaque model reflecting human COVID-19 pathological conditions

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104847118j1of9

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; nonhuman primate; elderly; underlying disease

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP19fk0108113, JP20fk0108414, JP20pc0101047]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency [JPMJPF2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined COVID-19 cynomolgus monkey models with underlying diseases, finding that elderly monkeys had higher levels and longer periods of viral RNA after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pneumonia was confirmed in all monkeys by computed tomography images.
The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global threat to human health and life. A useful pathological animal model accurately reflecting human pathology is needed to overcome the COVID-19 crisis. In the present study, COVID-19 cynomolgus monkey models including monkeys with underlying diseases causing severe pathogenicity such as metabolic disease and elderly monkeys were examined. Cynomolgus macaques with various clinical conditions were intranasally and/or intratracheally inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found in mucosal swab samples, and a higher level and longer period of viral RNA was detected in elderly monkeys than in young monkeys. Pneumonia was confirmed in all of the monkeys by computed tomography images. When monkeys were readministrated SARS-CoV-2 at 56 d or later after initial infection all of the animals showed inflammatory responses without virus detection in swab samples. Surprisingly, in elderly monkeys reinfection showed transient severe pneumonia with increased levels of various serum cytokines and chemokines compared with those in primary infection. The results of this study indicated that the COVID-19 cynomolgus monkey model reflects the pathophysiology of humans and would be useful for elucidating the pathophysiology and developing therapeutic agents and vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据