4.1 Article

Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA MEDICINA TROPICAL
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0182-2021

关键词

Seroprevalence; DPP (R)-Dual Path platform; IFA; ELISA; Dog; Caoservacao Program

资金

  1. Research Support Foundation of SAo Paulo State [2015/21954-8, 2015/21966-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a significant zoonosis in Brazil, with the identification of parasitized dogs being crucial for disease prevention. However, the accuracy of serological tests such as DPP (R)+ELISA has been questioned. A study in a non-endemic area of Sao Paulo state showed fluctuating seroprevalence rates of VL in dogs over three years.
Introduction: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry' of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP (R) (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP (R)+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. Methods: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the Sao Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. Results: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP (R)+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP (R) positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP (R) was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP (R)+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. Conclusions: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据