4.0 Article

Biometry in Umbu fruits from the semi-arid region of Paraiba

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA FRUTICULTURA
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452021808

关键词

Anacardiaceae; Caatinga; Morphological characterization; Spondias tuberosa Arr; Camara

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterized Umbu fruits from four municipalities in Paraiba in terms of morphological features, identifying promising genotypes for fresh consumption and agro-industrial use. The fruits from Queimadas and Sao Vicente do Serido showed the best morphological characters, while most fruits had hairs on the peel, except the commercial ones.
Umbu fruits from four municipalities of Paraiba were morphologically characterized in order to identify promising genotypes for fresh consumption and agro-industrial use. We used 400 fruits from parent plants located in Sao Vicente do Serido, Queimadas, Boqueirao, and Cabaceiras and 40 commercial fruits from two open fairs in Campina Grande, PB. The experimental unit consisted of ten fruits. The fruits were analyzed for total mass (MTF), length (LC), diameter (DF), fresh matter (MMF), yield (RF), and presence of hairs. In the endocarps, mass (ME), length (CE), diameter (DE), and width (LE) were the evaluated parameters. A completely randomized design was adopted, the data were subjected to variance analysis, and the means were compared by the Tukey test and principal component analysis. The fruits from Queimadas and Sao Vicente do Serido showed the best morphological characters with regard to mass, length, diameter, fresh matter, and fruit yield, and were the most promising for agro-industrial commercialization. The fruits from Boqueirao showed the highest endocarp mass. Most fruits showed hairs on the peel, except the commercial ones. Four groups of municipalities were formed, with the fruits from Queimadas showing the largest size, while the fruits from Sao Vicente de Serido and Soledade showed the highest yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据