3.8 Article

Role of vitamin C in the protection of the gum and implants in the human body: theoretical and experimental studies

期刊

出版社

VSEROSSIISKAYA ASSOTSIATSIYA KORROZIONISTOV
DOI: 10.17675/2305-6894-2021-10-3-22

关键词

vitamin C; implants; Hank's balanced solution; docking; FUKUI; dual descriptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the protective role of vitamin C for teeth, gums, and implants using quantum chemical calculations and polarization tests, finding that vitamin C can effectively inhibit corrosion in these areas. Through optimization of compound structure and physical properties, and using various parameters to predict inhibitor efficiency, the study confirms the potential of vitamin C as a protective agent.
The article describes a study on the role of vitamin C as a protective agent for the teeth, gum, and implants using quantum chemical calculations and polarization tests. The Density Functional Theory (DFT) at 6-311G (d, p) basis set is used to estimate the ability of vitamin C to inhibit the corrosion of the abovementioned parts. The experimental study was performed in a at human body media simulator (Hank's balanced salt solution) at a temperature of 37 degrees C. The compound was optimized for its ground state, physical properties, and corrosion parameters. Further, HOMO, LUMO, energy gap, dipole moment, and other parameters were used to predict the inhibitor's efficiency. Gaussian 09, UCA-FUKUI, MGL tools, DSV, and LigPlus software was used. According to electron density, Electrostatic Surface (ESP), Total Electron Density (TED), FUKUI function, and dual descriptor were used to show the active sites of adsorption. Also, docking studies were applied to predict the effect of vitamin C on A. ferrooxidans bacteria, which causes eroding the implants. The Ti6Al4V alloy was tested at three concentrations of the VC inhibitor using the polarization method. A concentration of 55 mg/L is the best in terms of inhibitor efficiency (99.62%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据