4.6 Article

Wash-free paper diagnostics for the rapid detection of blood type antibodies

期刊

ANALYST
卷 146, 期 22, 页码 6970-6980

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1an01250a

关键词

-

资金

  1. ARC [LP160100544]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP160100544] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper reports a novel and rapid paper-based antibody test that can quickly detect specific antibodies in patient plasma, with one application being the detection of COVID-19 antibodies. Test results are identified by analyzing the light intensity profile, and can be detected by eye and/or with image processing.
Identification of specific antibodies in patient plasma is an essential part of many diagnostic procedures and is critical for safe blood transfusion. Current techniques require laboratory infrastructure and long turnaround times which limits access to those nearby tertiary healthcare providers. Addressing this challenge, a novel and rapid paper-based antibody test is reported. We validate antibody detection with reverse blood typing using IgM antibodies and then generalise the validity by adapting to detect SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) antibodies in patient serum samples. Reagent red blood cells (RBC) are first combined with the patient plasma containing the screened antibody and a droplet of the mixture is then deposited onto paper. The light intensity profile is analyzed to identify test results, which can be detected by eye and/or with image processing to allow full automation. The efficacy of this test to perform reverse blood typing is demonstrated and the performance and sensitivity of this test using different paper types and RBC reagents was investigated using clinical samples. As an example of the flexibility of this approach, we labeled the RBC reagent with an antibody-peptide conjugate to detect SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) antibodies in patient serum samples. This concept could be generalized to any agglutination-based antibody diagnostics with blood plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据