4.6 Article

Enhanced electrocatalytic H2S splitting on a multiwalled carbon nanotubes-graphene oxide nanocomposite

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 43, 页码 20266-20271

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj00432h

关键词

-

资金

  1. DAE-BRNS, Mumbai Research project [34/20/06/2014-BRNS/21gs]
  2. FAST-TRACK DST-SERB, New Delhi [SERB/F/7963/2014-15]
  3. DST_SERB, New Delhi [SERB/F/7490/2016-17]
  4. DAE-BRNS, Mumbai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The non-precious graphene oxide based oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes metal-free electrocatalytic system showed excellent performance and stability for the oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to produce hydrogen gas. Heteroatoms acted as promoters between the MWCNTs and GO, leading to a superior current density and better stability for the H2S oxidation reaction. The presence of S atoms was found to facilitate the dissociation of S-H bonds, enhancing the overall efficiency of the system.
A non-precious graphene oxide (GO) based oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) metal-free electrocatalytic system was fabricated using a chemical method and was further used for the oxidation of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) to H-2. The system demonstrated surprising performance, attributed to the low onset potential in addition to the superior stability. Herein, heteroatoms including nitrogen, sulphur, and oxygen acted as promotors between the MWCNTs and GO for the hydrogen sulphide oxidation reaction. The electrochemical measurements indicated that the composite has a superior current density of 98.20 mA cm(-2) with better stability towards the H2S oxidation reaction. This enhancement will subsequently increase the current density for H-2 generation from H2S at an onset potential of -0.5 V versus a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). Furthermore, compared with the initiation barrier on different surfaces, it was observed that the presence of S atoms can facilitate the first S-H bond dissociation and drive the second dissociation of S-H species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据