4.1 Review

Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Setting of Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

期刊

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18740

关键词

advanced heart failure; adhf; hfref; acute decompensated heart failure; heart failure; acute heart failure; entresto; angiotensin neprilysin inhibitor; arni; sacubitril/valsartan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of using sacubitril/valsartan in acute decompensated heart failure. The findings suggest that it is an effective measure for patients with ADHF and cardiogenic shock, with overall good safety outcomes but some reports of serious adverse events recommending cautious use.
Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is one of the conditions associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity, in addition to its economic burden. Sacubitril/valsartan, the emerging drug in the field of heart failure, has been showing favorable outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its efficacy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure remains obscure. This systematic review aims to offer more clarity to this established gap of knowledge. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ScienceOpen were explored to gain access to studies on this topic. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using sacubitril/valsartan in the acute setting. Five clinical trials, 10 observational studies, including two abstracts, in addition to seven case reports and one editorial, were obtained and analyzed. Key outcomes of interest were safety and tolerability, efficacy reflected by N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and other serum and echocardiographic parameters. Additionally, target dose attainment, rehospitalization rates, and hemodynamics effect were also outcomes of interest. Based on our findings, the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with ADHF and cardiogenic shock is an effective measure. Although most of the results pointed to its safety, some of them showed the outcome of serious adverse events recommending its cautious use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据