4.7 Article

Improved proton conductivity and structure stability of an SPEEK/SPPS blend membrane for vanadium redox flow batteries

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 5, 期 23, 页码 8171-8182

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qm01161h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875163]
  2. Opening Fund of CAS Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing sulfonated polyphenylene sulfide with a rigid main chain into a SPEEK-based proton exchange membrane enhances proton conductivity and dimensional stability. The blend membrane at 15 wt% SPPS content shows superior proton conductivity, ion selectivity, voltage efficiency, energy efficiency, cycling stability, and charge capacity retention compared to Nafion 117, demonstrating exceptional structural stability and durability.
Sulfonated polyphenylene sulfide (SPPS) containing a rigid main chain is introduced into a SPEEK-based proton exchange membrane to obtain high proton conductivity and dimensional stability. With varied contents of SPPS, the SPEEK/SPPS blend membranes present increased proton conductivity, and at 15 wt% SPPS, the SPEEK/SPPS-15% membrane shows higher proton conductivity (30.9 mS cm(-1)) and ion selectivity (10.5 x 10(3) S min cm(-3)) than Nafion 117 (26.8 mS cm(-1), 4 x 10(3) S min cm(-3)). Moreover, a cell assembled with the SPEEK/SPPS-15% membrane demonstrates better voltage efficiency (VE: 92.5-75.0%) and energy efficiency (EE: 90.0-74.2%) in the current density range of 60-150 mA cm(-2). During a 100-time charge-discharge cycle at 100 mA cm(-2), excellent cycling stability and high charge capacity retention are proved, and the SPEEK/SPPS-15% blend membrane proves its outstanding structural stability and durability after 300 cycles at 150 mA cm(-2). This shows that the structural similarity of the membrane matrix is beneficial to develop a high-performance SPEEK/SPPS blend membrane with desirable structural stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据